Entropy

A(nother) man was murdered in South Africa today. This one happened to be on a farm, and happened to be white. If the latest (2009) statistics on farm attacks from the SA government are to be believed, we’re looking at 165 attacks per year with an increasing trend.

But what seemed to have made all the difference in this case is that the man murdered was Eugène Terre’Blanche.

White South Africans in particular may find themselves paralyzed, or worse, making wild generalised statements out of fear. Not because they share ET’s far-right wing ideologies, but because of a conflation of unfortunate events.

Our local court jester, Julius Sello Malema, led a gathering in the singing of Idubula Ibhunu (“Shoot the Boer”) at the University of Johannesburg on 9 March 2010 (source, accessed on 4 April 2010). This led to a backlash throughout the month that eventually saw the song as being declared hate speech, but had the ruling party (the African National Congress) respond by appealing the decision. Naturally, many white South Africans saw this as the government supporting the hatred of whites (and minorities in general) Malema seems to be preaching, rather than seeing it as them attempting to defend their right to sing any song they pleased, anywhere they liked.

The South African constitution doesn’t allow that amount of freedom of speech, however (from my limited knowledge of consititional law). You (whether black or white) aren’t allowed to sing a song with the lyrics “Shoot/kill the Boer” anymore than you’re allowed to sing  a song with the hypothetical lyrics “Burn the Black” or “Run over the Indian with an 18-wheeler.”

So because we let our government and our government’s sock puppets keep us in racially charged fear we might be tempted to see this attack for more than it is.

All indications currently point to a wage dispute. Both News24 and The Post have reported that the SAPS have stated that their current theory for motive is that ET didn’t pay his murderers for work they did for him. It is most likely that it had nothing to do with the infernal song that is at the foremost part of our collective psyche. It is even highly possible that the murder had nothing to do with Terre’blanche’s prior sins.

Occam’s razor pointing to the likelihood of a more conventional money-based motive rather than a racial one shouldn’t be that comforting, though. At the risk of being overly speculative I think this is a unique opportunity to get depressingly analytical about the state of the nation.

Hundreds of farm attacks occur every year and yet there’s rarely as quick and definitive a response as has been to ET’s. Within hours two young men were arrested and charged with his murder. Most farmers that are attacked like this don’t have the privelege of such swift justice. It’s ridiculous how differently you’re treated by the police when you have a known face, or when the media is watching a case. It’s unacceptable, in fact.

Let’s say the murder was financially motivated. More specifically, revenge for money not received because with the employer dead the employees obviously won’t be able to get their pay. How much could Terre’blanche have owed them? Let’s overestimate and say just shy of R10 000 each. That’s well above the average monthly wage for a skilled worker. It’s likely that these two young men were labourers and not skilled workers (reducing that estimate to R3000 each) but we don’t know that for sure yet.

R20k… Is that what a life is worth?

Maybe that’s too utilitarian a view. Maybe this was about the principle of the thing and not just the money. One man promised two young men compensation for work and then didn’t hold up his side of the bargain. Revenge for broken trust, not just unpaid wages. Not impossible, but completely unlikely.

The experts agree on gun control

I’ve had the pleasure of meeting Bheki Cele and heard him speak informally about the state of crime in South Africa. I don’t know how much of the conversations in private meetings like that are appropriate to disclose, but suffice it to say the man’s impromptu speech gave me hope for this country.

There seem to be a number of issues where the commissioner and I don’t see eye-to-eye, however. There was his emotional reaction to seeing a small replica of “Die Prinsevlag” on a woman’s desk, and then there’s todays news where he’s quoted as saying that only law enforcers should need guns. This is one of the advertisement taglines of Beeld today as well, probably because it’s a topic that’s close to home for the majority of the Afrikaans demographic who are a bit like Texans when it comes to issues of gun control.

Now there’s a good chance that what Cele said is being taken horribly out of context (by me and the media), but considering the ANC’s history with gun control matters, I think it’s fair to assume that it was meant as we interpret it. It also makes sense for governments to not want their civillians armed, or otherwise capable of defending themselves, because it means they can bully or strongarm them into doing whatever they want.

I think it’s important for me to state at this point that I think our current firearm legislation is good. The focus of the law is on preserving the sanctity of life. That is why you aren’t allowed to shoot a fleeing perpetrator, or fire upon people for trespassing on your property. You may only attempt to kill someone who is threatening your, or someone else’s life. That’s a good principle, if practically a little insensible. Generally by the time a robbery gets to the point where someone’s life is threatened it’s almost too late to do something about it (and live).

Our current legislation requires people to prove that they are competent enough to own a firearm. You need to pass an easy test and learn something about the law and firearms you’re applying for in the process. You’re legally allowed a combination of four firearms (neatly outlined at GunFactsSA), none of which may be automatic (unless you are a collector). That is cause for some concern, but for the average citizen that wants to protect themselves, a semi-automatic handgun or pump-action shotgun are good enough.

That said, the statements/threats of disarmament made by the people in government that seem to get to make unilateral decisions about these things, are troubling. They seem to be generally discontent with the level of protection the current law offers us.

If only the law enforcers and military have guns, how will the citizens protect themselves from a corrupt government? The truth is that governments are afraid of their citizens rising up when they’ve had enough, so they want to make sure their citizens have as little power to affect such change as possible. The fact is that despite our modern ‘civilised’ age might still makes right. If a government decides to oppress a people, or decides to wipe them off the planet, kick them out the coutry, or blame them for all their woes then their ability to execute that decision is proportional to the ability those citizens have to protect themselves.

In the words of V (from the film, probably not from the book): “People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.”

Or from a less fictional source: “The [balance of power] would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong.” –Anonymous: Attributed to Thomas Paine, Thoughts on Defensive War, July, 1775 [source]

While Paine was referring to war on the scale of nation against nation, I believe the philosophy can, and must be applied on a smaller scale.

When it comes to gun control, I’m with Chris Rock.